Loan-account audit
Reconcile principal, interest, penalties, fees, and payments against the bank ledger and contract.
A borrower who disputes interest, late charges, or fees should begin with the signed credit terms and a transaction-level calculation. “Unfair” is not a calculation: the useful question is whether each amount was agreed, disclosed, applied as contracted, and permitted by the rules applicable to that facility.
Request the complete account ledger and the bank’s method for computing principal, ordinary interest, default interest, compounding, fees, and payments. Compare the opening balance and every rate change with the facility agreement, amendments, notices, and repayment schedule. Keep bank statements and payment receipts, particularly if a disputed charge increased the amount used to support collateral enforcement.
Possible next steps include a written account dispute, negotiation, a formal consumer complaint, or a court claim, depending on the issue and relationship. A challenge to charges does not automatically suspend an auction or collection. Avoid relying on a generic “market rate” comparison without matching loan type, dates, risk, and contractual terms.
The lender’s balance grows despite payments, and the ledger does not explain how they were applied.
A rate or penalty changed without a matching contract amendment or notice in your records.
Fees appear that are absent from the facility agreement or supporting invoices.
The payoff demand uses a balance that differs from statements previously provided by the bank.
You need to quantify a disputed charge before negotiating restructuring or responding to enforcement.
The loan agreement and Indonesian Civil Code govern contractual obligations, subject to applicable banking and consumer-protection rules. UU 10/1998 provides the banking-law framework, while UU 8/1999 may be relevant to consumer issues depending on whether the borrower and transaction fall within its scope. There is no universal statutory interest cap that can be assumed for every commercial facility.
Article 1766 of the Civil Code concerns interest on loans, but its application to a commercial credit arrangement and any compounding issue requires careful review of the contract and current law. A court claim should identify the exact contractual or legal defect and calculate its financial effect. OJK complaint mechanisms may address regulated institution conduct but do not replace court determination of every contractual dispute.
We reconstruct the account using the agreement, amendments, ledger, rate notices, invoices, and payment evidence. The review identifies the disputed entry, calculation method, and amount in question, while separating arithmetic errors from legal arguments about enforceability or disclosure.
We prepare a concise written dispute and assess whether lender discussion, an internal complaint, OJK escalation, or court proceedings fit the facts. If the claimed balance supports an auction, we consider that deadline separately; disputing charges should not be presented as an automatic stay.
Reconcile principal, interest, penalties, fees, and payments against the bank ledger and contract.
Compare the agreed pricing terms and notices with the actual calculation applied.
Prepare a line-item objection supported by account records and a requested correction.
Evaluate court and regulated-institution complaint options, including enforcement urgency.
Do not assume one universal cap for all commercial loans. The applicable rate and restrictions depend on the contract, product, applicable rules, and facts; a lawyer should verify the exact basis before a challenge is framed.
The answer depends on the contract, calculation method, and applicable law, including the relevance of Civil Code provisions. Ask the bank to identify the clause and show the account calculation rather than relying on a label alone.
Collect the signed agreement and amendments, full account ledger, monthly statements, rate notices, fee invoices, payment receipts, and the current demand. Note any payments or restructuring communications missing from the ledger.
A complaint does not automatically halt enforcement. If a sale is scheduled, obtain prompt advice about the specific procedural remedy, forum, and evidence that may be available.
A party that signed as surety for the loan may have rights under the undertaking and facility documents, but standing, governing law, service, and authority must be checked. Preserve executed copies and corporate approvals, and obtain a clear statement of the amount claimed from the guarantor.
Tort claim against banks in Surabaya. Unlawful act litigation against banks for misconduct, wrongful execution, and consumer protection violations.
Debtor rights in KPKNL auction in Surabaya. Legal protections, surplus proceeds, and procedural rights for debtors facing forced auction.
Debt verification before auction in Surabaya. Ensuring auction proceeds cover outstanding debt and verifying debt calculations are correct.
Debt restructuring even with auction scheduled in Surabaya. Legal strategies to stop auctions and negotiate restructurings in East Java.
Describe your legal needs. A senior partner will respond within one business day.