Debt and notice review
Check facility terms, payoff calculations, default letters, security, and auction documents.
A scheduled auction does not prevent a borrower from asking the lender to restructure the debt, but a request is not a stay. A workable proposal must address repayment capacity, collateral, timing, and the lender’s written decision while the auction timetable is checked separately.
This service is for a borrower who can present a credible alternative to immediate enforcement: revised instalments, a negotiated payoff, additional funding, or a voluntary collateral sale. The first task is to understand the current position, not assume that a conversation with a relationship manager changes the formal default or auction status.
Prepare the facility and security agreements, payment history, current payoff calculation, notices, auction announcement, recent financial statements, cash-flow forecast, and evidence supporting the proposed source of funds. State what the borrower can pay now, what can be paid later, and which assumptions depend on asset sales or new financing. A proposal that does not reconcile to actual cash flow may weaken rather than clarify negotiations.
The borrower should request a written standstill or other documented change if the lender is willing to pause action. In parallel, confirm the auction stage with the lender and relevant KPKNL office. If an existing dispute concerns the debt calculation, notice, collateral, or authority to enforce, preserve those records and assess it separately from the commercial restructuring request.
An auction notice has arrived, but the business can support a realistic revised payment plan.
New cash flow, refinancing, or a buyer may create a credible source for settlement.
The lender has not responded to a proposal or has rejected it without explaining its calculation.
Multiple facilities or creditors need coordinated treatment to make a workout viable.
The borrower needs to distinguish negotiation from a legal mechanism that could affect enforcement.
A consensual restructuring ordinarily depends on contract terms, lender policy, and the parties’ agreement; there is no general rule that a bank must accept a debtor’s requested schedule or that a restructuring request automatically stops a mortgage auction. The relevant loan covenants, acceleration provisions, security documents, and any written waiver or standstill should be reviewed closely.
Where a debtor is unable to pay debts to more than one creditor, PKPU (suspension of debt payment obligations) under UU 37/2004 may be a distinct court-supervised option, subject to statutory eligibility and procedure. It is not interchangeable with bilateral bank restructuring. A PKPU application is handled by the competent Pengadilan Niaga; the effect on secured enforcement and the applicable period must be checked against the statute and case facts.
A scheduled security auction may be administered through KPKNL, while a court action over the debt or enforcement may be heard by a Pengadilan Negeri or another competent forum depending on the claim. Counsel should identify the route, parties, and any order that actually changes the auction position before advising that enforcement is paused.
We reconcile the lender’s stated debt with the facility documents and the borrower’s financial evidence, then shape a proposal with a defined payment source, milestones, collateral treatment, and requested standstill. We keep commercial negotiations distinct from any court or auction challenge.
If the lender does not agree, we assess the written reasons, other creditor exposure, and the remaining enforcement options. Any PKPU or court filing requires a separate eligibility and consequence review; filing is not presented as an assured outcome.
Check facility terms, payoff calculations, default letters, security, and auction documents.
Prepare a repayment or settlement proposal linked to financial records and evidence of funding.
Coordinate discussions about revised terms, collateral, and any written pause in enforcement.
Assess whether PKPU or a court challenge is available and how it may interact with secured enforcement.
You may ask the lender to consider a workout, but the scheduled auction does not automatically stop. Obtain written confirmation of any pause and verify the auction status independently.
It should show verified income and cash flow, a realistic payment schedule, available funding, treatment of collateral, and assumptions that can be evidenced. The lender may request further information or reject the proposal.
Do not assume that it does. PKPU has statutory effects, but their application to a particular secured claim and enforcement step requires review under UU 37/2004 and any court orders.
Ask for the decision and relevant debt calculation in writing, preserve the correspondence, and assess the contract and enforcement process. A complaint or lawsuit does not itself assure postponement.
Collect the loan and security documents, notices, audited or management accounts, bank statements, aged receivables and payables, cash-flow forecast, and evidence of any proposed capital or asset-sale proceeds.
How to postpone a KPKNL auction in Surabaya. Legal procedures to delay or stop forced auctions through KPKNL in East Java.
Debtor rights in KPKNL auction in Surabaya. Legal protections, surplus proceeds, and procedural rights for debtors facing forced auction.
Challenge unfair interest and penalties in Surabaya. Legal action against excessive bank charges, unfair penalties, and unconscionable interest rates.
Private sale before auction in Surabaya. Legal framework for executing private (underhand) sales before forced auction to maximize property value.
Describe your legal needs. A senior partner will respond within one business day.