Deed and registration review
Check fiduciary deed, collateral description, parties, registration particulars, and supporting transaction records.
Fiduciary security lets a grantor retain possession of qualifying assets while securing an obligation, but registration and accurate asset descriptions are central to a lender's position. Integra Law Office advises lenders and borrowers on creation, review, enforcement disputes, and release.
In business finance, fiduciary security may cover movable property, including equipment, vehicles, inventory, or receivables, subject to governing law and asset details. Identify the secured debt, owner or grantor, collateral, and existing security before execution. A vague description or mismatch between deed and asset records can create disputes about what was secured.
Registration is not a clerical afterthought. The fiduciary deed and electronic registration information should match the transaction and authorized parties, with certificate and underlying records retained together. Lenders should track amendments, substitutions, repayment, and releases; borrowers should understand which assets are covered and what default may trigger enforcement.
A lender is taking movable assets or receivables as collateral for a new facility.
A company needs to check whether existing fiduciary registrations match its current debt and asset portfolio.
A borrower receives a demand to surrender or sell collateral after a payment default.
The parties disagree about collateral description, outstanding amount, or default permitting enforcement.
A loan has been repaid and borrower needs to document release of registered security.
UU 42/1999 on Fiduciary Security governs creation, registration, rights, and enforcement. Security is constituted by a notarial fiduciary deed and registration under the statutory framework; certificate and registration particulars should be checked against the deed. Priority and third-party effect depend on compliance with requirements, so possession of an asset or an unregistered private agreement should not be assumed to provide the same position.
Constitutional Court decisions concerning fiduciary enforcement affect treatment of default and voluntary surrender when parties dispute default or debtor does not surrender the object voluntarily. A creditor should not assume a certificate authorizes physical repossession regardless of facts and current law. Enforcement may require agreement, court process, or a legally available sale method. Counsel should confirm current interpretation before action.
For review, gather notarial deed, certificate and registration record, facility agreement, amendments, asset schedules, invoices or ownership records, default notices, payment ledger, and surrender or sale communications. For a company portfolio, reconcile each security record to debtor, facility, collateral, and release status.
For lenders, we compare deed, registration record, asset information, and facility terms, then identify gaps affecting scope, priority, or enforcement. For borrowers, we check secured obligation, asserted default, notices, and proposed means of taking or selling collateral. The record determines whether parties can agree a remedy or need formal dispute process.
We help document amendments, refinancing, portfolio changes, and releases so records track the commercial position. No enforcement route should be selected from the certificate alone; counsel must account for the current statutory framework, court interpretation, and whether borrower disputes default or surrender.
Check fiduciary deed, collateral description, parties, registration particulars, and supporting transaction records.
Prepare or review fiduciary documents alongside the relevant credit agreement and corporate authority records.
Assess default, notices, voluntary surrender, sale options, and disputes concerning possession or collateral scope.
Reconcile registrations to debts and assets, and document amendments or releases when obligations change.
No blanket assumption is safe. UU 42/1999 provides an enforcement framework, but current constitutional interpretation distinguishes agreed default and voluntary surrender from disputed situations. Review default evidence, communications, and proposed method before possession is taken.
Compare the demand with facility and fiduciary deed, verify claimed balance and default, and preserve notices and payment records. Do not ignore the demand; prompt review can identify factual disputes and lawful negotiation or response options.
Provide notarial deed, registration record and certificate, facility agreement, asset schedule, ownership evidence, amendments, and payment history. If a dispute exists, add default notice and communications about surrender or sale.
Confirm the secured obligation and applicable release requirements, then complete the appropriate discharge or registration update. Keep evidence of payment and release; check exact administrative steps against current procedures.
Credit agreement lawyer in Surabaya. Loan agreement drafting, facility agreement review, and covenant negotiation for banks and borrowers.
Financial lawyer in Surabaya. Banking regulations, credit agreements, restructuring, guarantees, and financial dispute resolution in East Java.
Mortgage (hak tanggungan) lawyer in Surabaya. Land mortgage registration, enforcement, and dispute resolution for banks and property owners in East Java.
NPL restructuring lawyer in Surabaya. Non-performing loan restructuring, creditor negotiation, haircuts, and workout solutions for companies in East Java.
Describe your legal needs. A senior partner will respond within one business day.