Governance and records review
Review articles, shareholder agreements, share registers, meeting notices, minutes, and relevant financial information.
Shareholder conflict can stall decisions, expose confidential information, and weaken a company’s ability to operate. Integra Law Office helps shareholders and companies assess governance records, negotiate an exit or governance solution, and pursue claims where appropriate.
Disagreements may concern access to company information, dividends, director appointments, related-party transactions, new share issues, or a proposed sale. The articles of association, shareholder agreement, meeting notices and minutes, share register, and financial records define the starting point. Collect these alongside written objections and board or general meeting decisions before making a public allegation or blocking company activity.
The available response depends on who suffered the alleged harm and in what capacity. A company claim, an individual shareholder claim, and a challenge to a corporate resolution are not interchangeable. A negotiated buyout or governance protocol may preserve value, while litigation may be considered if a statutory right or contractual commitment is at stake and discussion cannot resolve it.
A minority holder is excluded from information or decisions affecting the investment.
Shareholders disagree about dividends, director appointments, or a related-party transaction.
A general meeting is called or conducted in a way a shareholder considers procedurally defective.
An ownership deadlock prevents approval of budgets, contracts, or management changes.
A shareholder wants to sell or buy shares but disputes valuation, transfer restrictions, or process.
Law No. 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Companies governs corporate organs, meetings, shares, and shareholder rights, subject to amendments and the company’s constitutional documents. Article 61 provides a route for a shareholder to bring a claim against the company in the District Court where the company is domiciled if the shareholder suffers loss from an unfair and unreasonable company action as described by the statute. Its elements and remedy must be assessed carefully.
A challenge to a general meeting resolution may raise different statutory and procedural issues from a claim for personal loss or a contractual dispute under a shareholder agreement. Forum and standing depend on the claim, domicile, and any arbitration clause. The Surabaya District Court may be relevant for a company domiciled in its jurisdiction, but that must be verified rather than assumed.
We map ownership and control from the company’s current records, compare the articles and shareholder agreement, and check the formal steps behind disputed decisions. The analysis separates what is documented from what must be established through accounting, witness, or meeting evidence. We then compare negotiated governance changes, a structured share transfer, mediation, and court or arbitration routes where available.
Where a meeting or corporate action is upcoming, we identify the records and objections that should be preserved and examine applicable notice and procedure. For an exit discussion, we review transfer restrictions, valuation method, payment security, and releases. No valuation method or remedy should be assumed until the governing documents and company position are reviewed.
Review articles, shareholder agreements, share registers, meeting notices, minutes, and relevant financial information.
Develop a documented proposal for governance changes, information access, distributions, or a share transfer.
Assess procedural records and prepare advice or representation concerning a contested corporate decision.
Prepare or defend proceedings after checking standing, forum, evidence, and the precise relief sought.
Potentially, depending on the conduct, the shareholder’s loss, statutory requirements, and the available remedy. Law No. 40 of 2007 includes shareholder rights and court routes, but not every disagreement qualifies for a claim. Counsel should distinguish company loss from personal loss and review the records before filing.
Start with the articles of association, shareholder agreement, share register, meeting notices and minutes, resolutions, financial statements, and correspondence about the disputed action. Keep original notices and delivery records. These documents help establish ownership, procedure, authority, and each party’s position.
Foreign ownership does not by itself answer standing, service, governing law, or forum questions. Corporate authorization, identity and ownership records, translations, and service arrangements may be needed. Review the company documents and any arbitration clause before selecting a route.
Check first for a deadlock, escalation, mediation, or transfer mechanism in the shareholder agreement and articles. If none applies, parties can explore a negotiated governance change, buyout, or legally available proceedings. A forced sale or dissolution should not be assumed without verifying its legal basis and consequences.
Business dispute lawyer in Surabaya. Commercial litigation, mediation, arbitration, and dispute resolution for companies in East Java.
Corporate lawyer in Surabaya. Company formation, governance, compliance, contracts, and M&A advisory for businesses in East Java.
General meeting (GMS/EGMS) lawyer in Surabaya. Meeting convocation, agenda preparation, voting, minutes, and regulatory compliance for shareholder meetings.
Shareholders agreement lawyer in Surabaya. SHA drafting, governance provisions, tag-along/drag-along rights, and dispute resolution mechanisms.
Describe your legal needs. A senior partner will respond within one business day.